Application of Capital Southeast Connector
goals and objectives to El Dorado Hills:
Failure.

Connector logo, modified

To date, Connector planning for the El Dorado Hills area has been negligent, failing to consider alignments other than White Rock Road. Use of White Rock Road is noncompliant with Connector objectives stated by both SACOG and the Capital Southeast Connector JPA.

The most significant point of noncompliance with Connector objectives stated by SACOG is:


Goal 3: Relieve traffic from local streets and roads and regional freeways.

The Purpose and Need document dated 2/17/2010 according to the JPA web site, but apparently updated as recently as June 18, 2010 notes in its description of needs:
The Connector's White Rock Road alignment would route non-local traffic through the heart of El Dorado Hills, where White Rock Road is a very important local street.

The same document cites this planning principle for the Connector:
Relieve demand on (i) local streets and roads, and (ii) regional freeway facilities (US-50, SR-99, and I-5)

The same document also states that the Connector will

Reduce cut-through traffic on local streets 

Use of White Rock Road as the Connector fails to do this, and in fact achieves the opposite:  Increasing cut-through traffic.

The basic problem is that White Rock, the Connector itself,  is  a local street in El Dorado Hills. It is planned to route regional through traffic directly through the Town Center and Business Park area, and specifically through the most traffic-sensitive intersection in the city: White Rock Road and Latrobe Road.


If the existing Connector program plan is used, it follows that the Connector can only achieve its stated goals and satisfy its stated needs and objectives if the JPA  plans and builds additional roadways which will reduce traffic on the Connector itself (Whiter Rock Road) in the El Dorado Hills area.



The remainder of this text is the best available concise summary of Connector goals and objectives. With the White Rock Road alignment almost all of these objectives are either problematic or inapplicable to El Dorado Hills.


Goals and Objectives defined in the 2006 Environmental Phase 1 Studies
- Final Technical Report from SACOG.


Goal 1: Enhance the accessibility to existing and planned employment areas.
Goal 2: Provide more options for travelers and the movement of goods and services to, from and within the corridor. Goal 3: Relieve traffic from local streets and roads and regional freeways.
    [As stated in later documents:  
Goal 4: Enhance access to recreational open space and preserve sensitive habitat.

Detail pages for the Connector JPA discussion are:
Return to Connector JPA root page    Return to SierraFoot home page