El Dorado Irrigation District (EID) 2011 election
Harry Norris vs Alan Day for Division 5 Director, El Dorado Hills
Summary

Also see Review of Alan Day campaign statements for fact checks


Harry Norris should have another term as our EID Division 5 Director unless Alan Day, his only opponent, can tell us very specifically what he can do better. Harry Norris' record continues to focus on reality and responsibility to ratepayers. Elected in November 2003, he joined the EID board in 2004. Its planning in that year was still guided by need to accommodate record high growth in El Dorado Hills. Also in 2004, growth began to drop, finally plummeting to effectively zero in 2009 throughout the county.

His opponent, Alan Day, has presented arguments about spending, debt, and rates that depend on EID business before 2004, when Al Vargas represented Division 5. One of the recurring problems in candidate Day's statements is his implicit suggestion that Harry Norris is culpable for EID actions over "the past 8 years". That includes year 2003, when Al Vargas -- not Harry Norris -- represented Division 5.

In spending, Harry Norris and the current board have cut $202 million out of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) just since 2009. They variously arrested and deferred plans for major capacity expansion at the EDH Water Treatment Plant, the two west-county wastewater treatment plants, and related infrastructure. EID also reduced operating costs, cutting employment by 79 from its record high of 305 in 2007 to 226, its lowest level since 2002.

Alan Day considers excess capacity a sign of excess spending. That was partly right when population growth began to drop, but the cause was the rapid change in growth. EID adjusted, but capacity grew in 2009 and 2010 due to major decrease in demand for water: Two years of exceptionally cool and wet weather dropped 2010 water deliveries to their lowest level since some year before 1990. That revenue loss is partly offset by increased hydroelectric generation from Project 184, which produced $8 million in 2010.

While Harry Norris has been on the board, 2004-2011, debt has grown 49%. This is well below the 200% (tripling) that Alan Day said of the last 8 years, 2003-2011.

Alan Day said EID Water rates have nearly doubled in 8 years, for a 100% increase. EID's own one-number citation is 78%, but drilling down to residential rates in Harry Norris' term, 2004-2011, shows less. At 4,000 cubic feet  per 2-month billing period, just over my own peak summer use, the increase is 61%. 2,000 cubic feet is up 37%, my winter consumption of 1,000 cubic feet had only a 19.9% increase.

EID's water rates were the lowest in the Sacramento region until the 2010 increases. Now EID is the 3rd lowest among 14 water providers surveyed. My actual 2011 peak summer water consumption would cost 65% more in Placerville.

Alan Day says sewer bills are 50%+ higher than 8 years ago. Actually they're 97% higher than 8 years ago (2003), but only 75% higher for rates that Harry Norris helped to set. My own 2011 EID sewer bills would be 47% higher in the City of Placerville.

Harry Norris has demonstrated exceptional knowledge, intelligence, and responsibility to his constituents. This is what EID needs in these times of economic stress.


 Go to Review of Alan Day campaign statements     Return to Sierrafoot home page